Digital Right to be Forgotten
Few people know about it. People in the EU have the right to have past links to personal data removed from search engines, like Google. People can get all their personal information from search engines and social networks if they so choose. This can happen officially in accordance with Europe’s initiative.
A Common Scenario
A young 18-19 year old person with friends in a concert drinking heavily, high or drunk is usually doing so because they’re having fun and enjoying themselves. But in the heat of the moment, it’s hard to remember exactly what happened. They often feel embarrassed by this and end up leaving more damage than if they had just left before things got out of hand. Your friends find it comical, and they take a photo on their phone to share with the world. It ends up going viral, and you end up having the last laugh. Within ten years, a lot has indeed happened. It’s been quite the time! You have managed to establish a serious business, you are at the critical stage of building your client list, when suddenly someone finds your video online and it’s not exactly what they were expecting.
Representatives’ Statements
“Humans are social beings and the image we have of ourselves depends to a large extent on the opinion of others” says German Justice Minister Christiane Lambrecht. “Removing the digital traces of your past is a pretty new concept,” said the minister. The initiative has eventually led to a more welcoming and personal environment, where people can learn from their own errors. There is freedom in the choice of learning. People have been taking persistent notes throughout history, but modern technology is the reason why they finally become more prevalent in the digital world.
Their importance has shifted from just a select few people to everyone and everything. “But in the knowledge economy and social market “no forgetting” would be impossible to maintain, so we need specifically designed tools to help us “forgetting”‘”, says Professor Carl Nicolaus Pifer of University of Cologne. Within the EU, this right found support by the evolving digital life. Such developments allow for better protection. The same principle affects all businesses in Europe so everyone is at risk. The “right to be forgotten” is now becoming a fundamental principle of law for safeguarding privacy. Justice Minister Christiane Lambrecht said that this most recent ruling gives users recently hacked or with personal data gathered without their consent the right to ask the information deleted, if not needed anymore.
An expiration date?
Schoenberger was the first to recognise the “right to be forgotten”, now permitted under EU law. As early as the end of 2000, he called for every publication in the digital world to be accompanied by an expiration date. So far this request has not been met.The publisher and author Daniel Boulter called for digital media websites to provide an expiry date in 2000. This move has not been widely adopted yet, but his requests are moving the tides.
Although the European Court of Justice has issued some interesting rulings in ways to protect people from online content, one related decision that may be troubling is the 2014 ruling that is still not final. The ECJ decides who can be mentioned on a search engine and in what capacity based on your country of residence, which means significant judgement-making power for citizens living in Spain. The landmark Luxembourg court ruling encouraged other Europeans to seek legal protection in the EU court system.
The right to be forgotten was explicitly enshrined in a new European Data Protection Directive in 2018. Since then, courts have had to weigh the right to protection of privacy and family life against the rights of third parties and the freedom of business.” Simply put: EU law doesn’t include an automatic or self-defined obligation to delete personal data. This is because business purposes outweigh individuals’ privacy rights in these circumstances. Prohibitions towards personal data collection and use exist only if there is a specific reason, such as ‘reasons of public interest’. In all cases, erasure applies only to the European Union region and not globally.
Digital oblivion
The German Justice Minister points out that there is a serious counter-argument to “digital oblivion”: it is about freedom of the press, considered the foundation of democratic functioning. This means that there must be good reasons for dismantling certain media outlets. As it turns out, data is becoming less and less accessible on certain platforms. By using different avenues like a targeted search, you’ll be able to find what you’re looking for. The First Amendment protects a number of US rights. One such right is the freedom of speech and freedom of the press. Judges in Europe are called upon to weigh legal rights in every case, while in the United States freedom of the press prevails.
Germany is not taking “digital oblivion” for granted. The BGH recently refused a request that would have allowed the storage of digital data indefinitely in the country, citing public interest considerations. It’s not easy to remove your information from search engines. A lot of patience is necessary, such as effective methods. Occasionally, Google is slow to respond to a request or states something that seems contradictory. However, law changes rapidly and there’s always a possibility of going to court.
If you liked this article, then you will probably also enjoy this one or this one.
Author: PC-GR
The World of Technology
